Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL

[Hyman Rosen]

Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> So a tarball with all the sources is somehow different from compiled and
> linked binary resulting from the same sources

Of course. The former is a verbatim copy of the source code, readily
reconstructed from its transmitted form. The other is not. In any case,
the only thing you have argued is that the former may not be a verbatim
copy either. It seems unlikely that such a view would prevail, however.

> See also Section 3

Of what? The copyright code? The GPL? You cannot expect people to make
your arguments for you, because your arguments are invariably incorrect.
You need to state your arguments, and then we will point out to you how
they are wrong.