[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: More FSF hypocrisy

From: Hyman Rosen
Subject: Re: More FSF hypocrisy
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 12:38:33 -0400
User-agent: Thunderbird (Windows/20081209)

Alexander Terekhov wrote:
Hyman Rosen wrote:
Nonsense, of course. Were the rights holders not interested in the
right to exclude, they would release the work into the public domain.

I tell you that if they were not interested in the right to exclude,
they would release to the public domain.

You quote a document intended to be used by authors to release their
works into the public domain! Did you even read the URL?

> How is the above "Public License Fallback" copyright license supporting
> the right to exclude

Well, or course it isn't supporting such a right. This public license is
intended to give out rights equivalent to public domain in cases where,
for some reason, actual release to public domain is not possible.

What does this have to do with the subject under discussion? As the
physicists like to say, you're not even wrong. Perhaps you should wait
with further posts until you have sobered up? You know what those drunk
judges do!

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]