[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: More FSF hypocrisy
From: |
Thufir Hawat |
Subject: |
Re: More FSF hypocrisy |
Date: |
Mon, 23 Mar 2009 22:32:40 GMT |
User-agent: |
Pan/0.132 (Waxed in Black) |
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 09:26:59 -0400, Rjack wrote:
>>> In the current suit Free Software Foundation Inc. v. Cisco Systems
>>> Inc. the FSF is asking for monetary damages:
>>
>> which is commercial, so the comparison fails there.
>
> Read the Grokfud link:
>
> [ Update: Ray Beckerman sends a correction. He says the reasoning of the
> four cases and two law review articles and the brief is equally
> applicable to commercial copyright infringement defendants.]"
> http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20090321164736122
>
> Sincerely,
> Rjack
" So it's more support for the concept of proportionality and asking the
court to consider the Constitutionality of statutory damages in copyright
cases involving noncommercial individuals."
-from the above link.
*cases involving noncommercial individuals*. Is cisco such an
individual?
-Thufir
- More FSF hypocrisy, Rjack, 2009/03/23
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Thufir Hawat, 2009/03/23
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Rjack, 2009/03/23
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy,
Thufir Hawat <=
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Rjack, 2009/03/23
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, JEDIDIAH, 2009/03/24
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Thufir Hawat, 2009/03/24
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Rjack, 2009/03/24
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/24
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Thufir Hawat, 2009/03/24
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Thufir Hawat, 2009/03/24
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Thufir Hawat, 2009/03/24
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/03/24
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/03/24