Re: More FSF hypocrisy

[amicus_curious]

"Hyman Rosen" <hyrosen@mail.com> wrote in message 
news:z5Sxl.45965$3S3.3834@newsfe22.iad...
> amicus_curious wrote:
> > But when push came to shove, their injunction was denied since they could 
> > not show any value for the non-monetary issues.
>
> No. A preliminary injunction was denied because the plaintiffs
> did not demonstrate the likelihood of irreparable harm should
> the preliminary injunction not be granted. And that's *did not*,
> not *could not* - they didn't try, because they thought they
> didn't have to:
Well, the District Court judge gave them a chance to re-file, but they chose 
not to do so.  Do you suggest that they just went into the tank because they 
didn't feel like winning?  You are grasping at straws.