[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: More FSF hypocrisy

From: amicus_curious
Subject: Re: More FSF hypocrisy
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 18:49:22 -0400

"Hyman Rosen" <> wrote in message news:z5Sxl.45965$3S3.3834@newsfe22.iad...
amicus_curious wrote:
But when push came to shove, their injunction was denied since they could not show any value for the non-monetary issues.

No. A preliminary injunction was denied because the plaintiffs
did not demonstrate the likelihood of irreparable harm should
the preliminary injunction not be granted. And that's *did not*,
not *could not* - they didn't try, because they thought they
didn't have to:

Well, the District Court judge gave them a chance to re-file, but they chose not to do so. Do you suggest that they just went into the tank because they didn't feel like winning? You are grasping at straws.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]