[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: More FSF hypocrisy
From: |
Hyman Rosen |
Subject: |
Re: More FSF hypocrisy |
Date: |
Tue, 24 Mar 2009 18:10:52 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209) |
Rjack wrote:
Here's what the Federal Judge thinks of ... Charles Nesson...:
...Nesson has also managed to infuriate the federal judge
overseeing the case...
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2009/03/p2p-judge-blasts-frivolous-motions-from-harvard-prof.ars
Because of how he's been behaving with respect to procedure,
not because of the nature of his opinions:
Judge Gertner "notes with displeasure the continuing
difficulties with the meet-and-confer requirement" and
says that the meetings "must not be conditioned on
Plaintiffs' consent to the recording of those sessions."
And the strange thing is:
What makes the whole situation even more surreal is that
Gertner actually found Nesson for Joel Tenenbaum when he
appeared before her as a pro se defendant.
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, (continued)
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, JEDIDIAH, 2009/03/24
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Thufir Hawat, 2009/03/24
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Rjack, 2009/03/24
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/24
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Thufir Hawat, 2009/03/24
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Thufir Hawat, 2009/03/24
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Thufir Hawat, 2009/03/24
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/03/24
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/03/24
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Rjack, 2009/03/24
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy,
Hyman Rosen <=
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Thufir Hawat, 2009/03/24
Re: More FSF hypocrisy, amicus_curious, 2009/03/23