gnu-misc-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: More FSF hypocrisy

From: Thufir Hawat
Subject: Re: More FSF hypocrisy
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 14:26:18 GMT
User-agent: Pan/0.132 (Waxed in Black) 
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 10:22:19 -0400, Rjack wrote:

> IF A COPYRIGHT LICENSE EXISTS, ITS LANGUAGE WILL BE INTERPRETED AS A
> CONTRACT IN DETERMINING ITS COVENANTS FOR PURPOSES OF BREACH AND THEN
> EXAMINED FOR LANGUAGE DETERMINING SCOPE FOR PURPOSES OF INFRINGEMENT.


Assuming this is so, what's your point?  All EULA would be contracts, 
yes?  Not complying with an EULA opens up a can of worms.


-Thufir
reply via email to
[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]