Re: More FSF hypocrisy

[Thufir Hawat]

On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 11:09:32 -0400, Rjack wrote:

>>> IF A COPYRIGHT LICENSE EXISTS, ITS LANGUAGE WILL BE INTERPRETED AS A
>>> CONTRACT IN DETERMINING ITS COVENANTS FOR PURPOSES OF BREACH AND THEN
>>> EXAMINED FOR LANGUAGE DETERMINING SCOPE FOR PURPOSES OF INFRINGEMENT.
>> 
>> 
>> Assuming this is so, what's your point?
> 
> The point of an original newsgroup post seems to evolvs with the number
> of posts to the thread. I think we were discussing legal enforcement of
> the GPL.


If EULA are contracts, what makes the GPL different from other EULA, in 
your view?


-Thufir