[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: More FSF hypocrisy
From: |
Hyman Rosen |
Subject: |
Re: More FSF hypocrisy |
Date: |
Wed, 25 Mar 2009 15:54:58 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209) |
Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> Non-commercial use IS a common scope-of-use limitation
The patent holder limited the manufacturer to selling the
amplifiers to non-commercial users. When the manufacturer
sold them to commercial users, those users did not acquire
the patent-exhaustion rights the non-commercial buyers got.
The GPL licenses copying and distribution only if the work
as a whole is distributed as specified by the GPL. Otherwise
there is no legal right to do so, and doing it anyway is
infringement on the rights of the copyright holder.
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, (continued)
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Rjack, 2009/03/25
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/03/25
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/25
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/03/25
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/25
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/03/25
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy,
Hyman Rosen <=
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/03/25
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/25
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/03/25
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/25
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/03/25
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/25
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Rjack, 2009/03/25
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/26
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Rjack, 2009/03/25
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/26