[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: More FSF hypocrisy
From: |
Hyman Rosen |
Subject: |
Re: More FSF hypocrisy |
Date: |
Thu, 26 Mar 2009 09:47:53 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209) |
Rjack wrote:
That leaves the GPL open to the different common law contract
> interpretation rules of the fifty different states (plus Guam
> and Puerto Rico).
This is not a problem because of 17 USC 301.
If it were legally enforceable, which it is not.
The GPL is legal and enforceable (in the sense that if someone
copies and distributes without obeying its conditions he is
liable for copyright infringement).
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, (continued)
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Thufir Hawat, 2009/03/25
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, amicus_curious, 2009/03/25
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Thufir Hawat, 2009/03/25
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/03/25
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/25
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Thufir Hawat, 2009/03/26
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, amicus_curious, 2009/03/26
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, amicus_curious, 2009/03/25
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Thufir Hawat, 2009/03/26
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Rjack, 2009/03/26
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy,
Hyman Rosen <=
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Rjack, 2009/03/26
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/26
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Rjack, 2009/03/26
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/26
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Thufir Hawat, 2009/03/26
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Thufir Hawat, 2009/03/26
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Thufir Hawat, 2009/03/26
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Thufir Hawat, 2009/03/26
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, amicus_curious, 2009/03/26
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/26