Re: More FSF hypocrisy

[Thufir Hawat]

On Thu, 26 Mar 2009 21:28:55 +0100, Alexander Terekhov wrote:

> Rahul Dhesi wrote:
>> 
>> Rjack <user@example.net> writes:
>> 
>> >Since the license is strictly construed against the drafter the
>> >license, because of promissory estoppel, would provide a defense to
>> >copyright infringement.
>> 
>> As I recall, when I asked you for what was promised, I got no answer.
> 
> Rahul, implicit in a copyright license is the promise not to sue for
> copyright infringement.

How is it not copyright infringement to distribute the work without 
following the terms of the license?


-Thufir