[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: More FSF hypocrisy

From: Thufir Hawat
Subject: Re: More FSF hypocrisy
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 21:27:36 GMT
User-agent: Pan/0.132 (Waxed in Black)

On Thu, 26 Mar 2009 21:28:55 +0100, Alexander Terekhov wrote:

> Rahul Dhesi wrote:
>> Rjack <> writes:
>> >Since the license is strictly construed against the drafter the
>> >license, because of promissory estoppel, would provide a defense to
>> >copyright infringement.
>> As I recall, when I asked you for what was promised, I got no answer.
> Rahul, implicit in a copyright license is the promise not to sue for
> copyright infringement.

How is it not copyright infringement to distribute the work without 
following the terms of the license?


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]