Re: More FSF hypocrisy

[Rjack]

Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> Hyman Rosen wrote: [...]
> > That's why the GPL carefully spells out all the requirements
> > which must be followed in order for permission to copy and
> > distribute to be granted, so that no one can argue that the
> > rights holders have given any other permission.

Thank God Hyman finally admitted there are "rights holders" --
that's *PLURAL* (see the 's' in 'holders'?) as in "bilateral
parties". Maybe there's hope for Hyman after all.

> Stop being utter idiot Hyman.
>
> Given, in the context of the GPL:
>
> (a) permissions (b) requirements
>
> Question:
>
> How can one possibly fulfill (b) without first taking advantage
> of (a)?
>
> Your answer:
>
> ...
>
> regards, alexander.
>
> -- http://gng.z505.com/index.htm (GNG is a derecursive recursive
> derecursion which pwns GNU since it can be infinitely looped as
> GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards too, whereas GNU
> cannot.)