[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Tom Tom and Microsofts Linux patent lock-down ..
From: |
Rahul Dhesi |
Subject: |
Re: Tom Tom and Microsofts Linux patent lock-down .. |
Date: |
Mon, 6 Apr 2009 00:36:05 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
nn/6.7.0 |
Having declared the GPL to have not only unenforceable terms, but also
illegal terms, Rjack is now trying to save the situation by quoting
answers.com and merriam-webster.com.
Has the Second Circuit's recent role as the leading authority on the
common law of contracts been usurped by these renegade web sites?
--
Rahul
http://rahul.rahul.net/
- Re: Tom Tom and Microsofts Linux patent lock-down .., Rahul Dhesi, 2009/04/04
- Re: Tom Tom and Microsofts Linux patent lock-down .., Alexander Terekhov, 2009/04/11
- can't charge for GPL software .., Doug Mentohl, 2009/04/11
- Re: can't charge for GPL software .., Alexander Terekhov, 2009/04/11
- Re: can't charge for GPL software .., Chris Ahlstrom, 2009/04/11
- Re: can't charge for GPL software .., Doctor Smith, 2009/04/12
- Re: can't charge for GPL software .., Hadron, 2009/04/12
- Re: can't charge for GPL software .., Doctor Smith, 2009/04/12
- Re: Tom Tom and Microsofts Linux patent lock-down .., dr_nikolaus_klepp, 2009/04/11
Re: Tom Tom and Microsofts Linux patent lock-down .., amicus_curious, 2009/04/04