Re: The GPL means what you want it to mean

[Rjack]

Thufir Hawat wrote:
> On Sat, 04 Apr 2009 09:20:08 -0400, Rjack wrote:
>
> > Thufir Hawat wrote:
> > > On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 07:44:43 -0400, Rjack wrote:
> > >
> > > > The Free Software Foundation has *never* advanced a legal argument to
> > > > refute the fact that the GPL is contractually unenforceable and
> > > > preempted by the Copyright Act.
> > >
> > > What's your argument that isn't enforceable?
> > The GPL is unequivocally a contract under U.S. law. (More specifically
> > it is a contract for a "grant of permission" or license.)
>
> It's just as much a contract as any other EULA.
>
>
> -Thufir

So?