Re: The GPL means what you want it to mean

[Rjack]

amicus_curious wrote:
> "JEDIDIAH" <jedi@nomad.mishnet> wrote in message 
> news:slrngtkmgi.vvv.jedi@nomad.mishnet...
>
> > > GPL license offerers are much more akin to homeowners who are 
> > > trying to rip off their invited guests by tempting them to 
> > > accept an illegal contract.
> >
> > Nice self-nuke on your part there...
> >
> > You either have a legal contract or you are tresspassing.
> I don't think that you understood the analogy.  Let me put it in 
> what might be a more understandable form.  Say you go to Chicago 
> for the Open Source Expo and you and your buddies, being new to the
>  big city, are wandering up State Street and get enticed into a 
> titty bar.  Then some sweet honeys cozy up to you and ask you to 
> buy them a drink.  "Sure!", you say, flattered by such attention. 
> Then later you find that the tab for the girls' drinks are not what
>  you expected and are some $50 apiece.  "Pay up or we will call the
>  cops!" is what you are told.
>
> Now that is more akin to the way that unsophisticates are lured 
> into using the "free" GPL code and then are hammered for their 
> birthright by the SFLC. "Ignorance is no excuse!", they say, 
> "What's yours is now ours, you have been touched!"

AHAH !!!!!!

By using the analogy of a "titty bar" you are displaying your ugly
misogynist side. Your sexist remarks have set women's rights
back at least a half century.

FOR SHAME !!!!