Re: The GPL means what you want it to mean

[dr_nikolaus_klepp]

amicus_curious wrote:

> 
> "dr_nikolaus_klepp" <dr.klepp@gmx.at> wrote in message
> news:2b749$49dbc4aa$557d7df2$824@news.inode.at...
>> chrisv wrote:
>>
>>>> rat wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>Now that is more akin to the way that unsophisticates are lured into
>>>>>using the "free" GPL code and then are hammered for their birthright by
>>>>>the SFLC. "Ignorance is no excuse!", they say, "What's yours is now
>>>>>ours,
>>>>>you have been touched!"
>>>
>>> So, you think software developers just grab source-code and use it in
>>> their projects, just assuming that it's free of copyright?  That would
>>> be pretty stupid, don't you think, considering all GPL'ed software
>>> will declare and reference the GPL?  Do you think willfully ignoring
>>> the copyright and GPL notification should be an "excuse"?
>>>
>>> Idiot.
>>
>> nice how you added that "idiot" :-)
>>
> Presumably that was facetious.  BTW, next to no one bothers with chrisv
> anymore.  He has little to say and nothing to contribute to any
> interesting
> conversations.  A minimal amount of lurking would tell you that.

didnt see that your contribution was anything else than bullshit.