[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: The GPL means what you want it to mean

From: Rjack
Subject: Re: The GPL means what you want it to mean
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 07:08:25 -0400
User-agent: Thunderbird (Windows/20090302)

RonB wrote:
Rahul Dhesi wrote:
Rjack still hasn't specified which of the terms in the GPL are illegal.
And he protests:

Not at all. Try reading my posts instead of denying and lying.
You been told many, many times. Review past posts I've made instead of
just denying and lying.

OK, readers, I need your assistance here.

I admit that I have not read everything that Rjack has ever posted.
Nor, I suspect, has anybody else, with the possible exception of
amicus_curious. But in the sample that I did read, I have not seen Rjack
ever specify exactly what in the GPL is illegal. For a short while I
thought he was referring to antitrust, but not, he said he was not.

Has anybody seen any specific description from Rjack in his posts that
tells us what in the GPL is illegal?

I killfiled Rjack shortly after his first message showed up. I have no idea what he's yammering on about -- but I'm guessing he's pretty much a crank in the "Snit mode." It doesn't matter how convincing your argument might be -- he'll just rewind and re-spew -- starting the whole thing all over again.

That's the crank way. Best to just killfile him.

I totally agree.

Rjack :)

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]