[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Cisco v FSF dismissed
From: |
John Hasler |
Subject: |
Re: Cisco v FSF dismissed |
Date: |
Fri, 24 Apr 2009 16:43:57 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) |
Alexander Terekhov writes:
> Why would Cisco *NOT* consent to the dismissal of a lawsuit against Cisco
> with prejudice?
Why *WOULD* the plaintiffs consent to the dismissal of a lawsuit against
Cisco with prejudice? Because Cisco agreed to give them what they wanted,
most likely.
> What "settlement" are you talking about?
The one the parties signed in private.
> Please provide the details.
You'll have to ask the parties. It's their settlement.
--
John Hasler
john@dhh.gt.org
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI USA
- Re: Cisco v FSF dismissed, (continued)
- Re: Cisco v FSF dismissed, amicus_curious, 2009/04/23
- Re: Cisco v FSF dismissed, Ciaran O'Riordan, 2009/04/23
- Message not available
- Re: Cisco v FSF dismissed, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/04/24
- Re: Cisco v FSF dismissed, Ciaran O'Riordan, 2009/04/24
- Message not available
- Re: Cisco v FSF dismissed, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/04/24
- Re: Cisco v FSF dismissed, John Hasler, 2009/04/24
- Re: Cisco v FSF dismissed, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/04/24
- Re: Cisco v FSF dismissed,
John Hasler <=
- Re: Cisco v FSF dismissed, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/04/24
- Re: Cisco v FSF dismissed, dr_nikolaus_klepp, 2009/04/28