Re: GPL traitor !

[Rjack]

Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> In gnu.misc.discuss Rjack <user@example.net> wrote:
>
> > It is extremely difficult to convince a U.S. federal court to 
> > enforce a copyright license that violates statutory federal 
> > copyright law as well as state common laws. No plaintiff has ever
> >  followed through on an attempt to convince a U.S. court to do
> > so. Just check the record for the SFLC and FSF in the Second
> > Circuit. To wit:
>
> Yet another attempt to Rjack this thread to your favourite 
> obsession. There've been hundreds of posts making this assertion, 
> mainly from you. Your argument has become tired and tedious over 
> these many posts.

Not so tired and tedious that you are refraining from whining in
reply. If I'm an obsessive crusader, then use your killfile. No one
is forcing your mouse to click. Why don't you just move to some other
forum that's a little more comforting to Freetards? Why not Groklaw?
PJ will zealously shield your eyes from criticism of your precious
GPL. There will then be balm in the land of GNU.

> Give it a rest for a few months, will you?

Just as soon as Freetards abandon their obsession with claims that the
GPL is an easily understood and enforceable copyright license. Somehow
Freetards have come to believe the World revolves around their GNU
religion -- but it doesn't

> Have a nice weekend.

You have a nice weekend too, Alan.

Sincerely,
Rjack :)


>