[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: GPL traitor !

From: Thufir Hawat
Subject: Re: GPL traitor !
Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 09:50:39 GMT
User-agent: Pan/0.132 (Waxed in Black)

On Mon, 11 May 2009 08:57:50 +0200, David Kastrup wrote:

> Thufir Hawat <> writes:
>> On Sat, 09 May 2009 10:52:41 +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
>>> They would clearly like not to have copyright apply to this situation,
>>> since then they would not need the GPL to provide its copyleft
>>> mechanism there.
>> Without copyright the GPL is pointless.
> Without an attack, a defense is pointless.

Nope.  The GPL rests upon the existence of copyright law, ie:  without 
copyright law there can be no GPL.  A burglar alarm is a defense without 
an attack, it's a precaution.  Or, would you say that a burglar alarm is 
pointless because no burglar is lurking about?  Or, a password on 
computer?  etc, etc.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]