[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GPL traitor !
From: |
Joerg Schilling |
Subject: |
Re: GPL traitor ! |
Date: |
20 May 2009 19:07:29 GMT |
In article <ErYQl.39714$0S.38169@newsfe22.iad>,
Hyman Rosen <hyrosen@mail.com> wrote:
>Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > http://www.opensource.org/docs/definition.php
> > ...
>> Yes, the GPL is conformant with this requirement. Software linked with GPLed
>> libraries only inherits the GPL if it forms a single work, not any software
>> with which they are merely distributed.
>
>Yes, this is exactly what I've been telling you. Why do you
>quote this to me as if it means something opposite? What is
>it about "forms a single work" that you don't understand?
A GPL progam that links against an independent library onvioously does not
form a "single work" together with the lib. The lib is just used by the program
and this is a permitted usage.
--
EMail:joerg@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
js@cs.tu-berlin.de (uni)
joerg.schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog:
http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
- Re: GPL traitor !, (continued)
- Re: GPL traitor !, Alan Mackenzie, 2009/05/20
- Re: GPL traitor !, Joerg Schilling, 2009/05/20
- Re: GPL traitor !, Hyman Rosen, 2009/05/20
- Re: GPL traitor !, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/05/20
- Re: GPL traitor !, Joerg Schilling, 2009/05/20
- Re: GPL traitor !, Hyman Rosen, 2009/05/20
- Re: GPL traitor !,
Joerg Schilling <=
- Re: GPL traitor !, Hyman Rosen, 2009/05/20
- Re: GPL traitor !, Joerg Schilling, 2009/05/20
- Re: GPL traitor !, Hyman Rosen, 2009/05/20
- Re: GPL traitor !, Hyman Rosen, 2009/05/20
- Re: GPL traitor !, Joerg Schilling, 2009/05/20
- Re: GPL traitor !, Hyman Rosen, 2009/05/20
- Re: GPL traitor !, Joerg Schilling, 2009/05/20
- Re: GPL traitor !, Hyman Rosen, 2009/05/20
- Re: GPL traitor !, Alan Mackenzie, 2009/05/20
- Re: GPL traitor !, Hadron, 2009/05/20