[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: GPL traitor !

From: David Kastrup
Subject: Re: GPL traitor !
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:39:49 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.92 (gnu/linux)

Andrew Halliwell <> writes:

> David Kastrup <> wrote:
>> Hyman Rosen <> writes:
>>> David Kastrup wrote:
>>>> Dynamic linking delays the act of copying, but it remains an
>>>> essential integral part of putting the program to its intended
>>>> use.
>>> The difference between static and dynamic linking is that in
>>> static linking the copying occurs as part of making and
>>> distributing the program, and in dynamic linking the copying
>>> occurs, if it does, as part of running the program. This is not
>>> an irrelevant detail; it's an essential difference.
>> It isn't.  The essential copy is the copy in the computer main memory,
>> and that is the same whether you link dynamically or statically.
> Wrong. If you link statically, the copy exists within the code itself.
> Any disc, printout, CD, flash memory stick that contains the program ALSO
> contains the statically compiled portions of the library.
> With dynamic linking the library exists seperately on the computer and is
> only loaded into memory when it is required on execution of the program.
>> Whether you deliver a script which does the static linking, or whether
>> you call the dynamic linker makes no difference.
> It does, y'know.

A gun stored in parts is still a gun.

David Kastrup

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]