Re: GPL traitor !

[Rjack]

Hyman Rosen wrote:
> Rjack wrote:
> > The inserted GPL library code is verbatim and unmodified.
>
> Untrue - static linking makes changes to the inserted library
> code as addresses are resolved. But that's probably not relevant.
>
> > The whole compilation is in no way "based" on unmodified GPL'd
>  > library code.
>
> False. The GPL itself defines what it means by "based", and that
> definition states that it describes a work other than a verbatim
> copy whose production requires copyright permission. 

Uh... you can't define your own copyright law and expect a federal 
court to enforce your new definition. Read 17 USC sec. 301.

Sincerely,
Rjack