Re: GPL traitor !

[Rjack]

Hyman Rosen wrote:
> Rjack wrote:
> > The revulsion you demonstrate for 17 USC 301 clearly foretells 
> > its potential to destroy your dreams of creating new copyrights 
> > through contractual fiat. Cavalierly dismissing it as "idiocy" 
> > won't make it go away though.
>
> No, no - I'm not dismissing 17 USC 301 as idiocy, I'm dismissing 
> your ludicrous opinion that it applies to the GPL as idiocy. The 
> GPL is a copyright license and it operates under normal federal 
> copyright law. Your unwillingness to recognize this and the 
> resultant twisting and spinning required to justify it is what 
> demonstrates your idiocy.

Do you think your strident name-calling is winning friends and
influencing people? Try incorporating substance and logic -- perhaps
that will carry you farther along than ad hominem argument.

Sincerely,
Rjack