Re: Microsoft's Linux Kernel Code Drop Result of GPL Violation

[Rjack]

Hyman Rosen wrote:
> Rjack wrote:
> > Micro$oft loved the GPL. The harassment from "Free Software"
> > advocates assists the heightening the entry barriers to new, high
> > quality competition for Micro$oft. The GPL and "Free Software"
> > also prevent meaningful antitrust action against Micro$oft by the
> > USDOJ. Steve Ballmer and Marshall Phelps are rolling on the floor
> > laughing at GNUtian Freetards.
>
> Oh, so you mean that by embracing GNU/Linux, Microsoft extinguishes
> other non-free software which might compete with their own non-free
> software, but does not extinguish GNU/Linux itself.
>
> Supposing this were true, why do you think that advocates of free
> software would be bothered by this?

RMS and his worshippers would like to destroy proprietary
software not empower Micro$oft's market share.

> If the lack of "high quality competition for Microsoft" leads
> overall to non-free software having lower quality, that is a boon
> for free software, not a bane.
 Even if it simply leads to there
> being less non-free software available, that itself is good. It
> makes creating free alternatives simpler.

You're babbling again Hyman. Get a grip.

> If Microsoft creates free software, free software advocates will
> welcome it regardless of presumed motivation.

Yeah. As long as Micro$oft keeps Linux boxed in its little pig pen,
we're all winners!!!! Higher prices, lower quality.

Sincerely,
Rjack