Re: Microsoft's Linux Kernel Code Drop Result of GPL Violation

[Rjack]

Hyman Rosen wrote:
> Rjack wrote:
> > RMS and his worshippers would like to destroy proprietary 
> > software not empower Micro$oft's market share.
>
> Advocates of free software don't prefer the situation of several 
> non-free software enterprises splitting the market over a single 
> one dominating it. If anything, having only one makes it easier to 
> create free replacements.
>
> > Yeah. As long as Micro$oft keeps Linux boxed in its little pig 
> > pen, we're all winners!!!! Higher prices, lower quality.
>
> Advocates of free software want software to be free. If you feel 
> disadvantaged by the non-free software that you use, free software 
> advocates would regard that as a bonus, as that might encourage you
>  to try and support free alternatives. Why would advocates of free 
> software want to take actions which would enhance the quality of 
> non-free software?
>
> If you believe that Microsoft is pleased that GNU/Linux exists 
> because it helps them maintain a monopoly in non-free software,

The #1 overwhelming of obsession of Freetards is Micro$oft's
monopoly. I realize that your attempting to save face Hyman but
you haqave a long way to go.

> and that this in turn displeases you, then you should believe not 
> that they are laughing at free software advocates, but that they 
> are laughing at you.

They're not laughing at me. I use FreeBSD and the BSD license.
Micro$oft is scared to death of the BSD license. Micro$oft is afraid
there are several Apples and Steve Jobs out there just waiting to bite
'em in the bottom line.

Sincerely,
Rjack

EMBRACE EXTEND EXTINGUISH