Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed

[Alexander Terekhov]

David Kastrup wrote:
[...]
> Is that a loophole for the GPL in US jurisdiction?  Maybe, but
> apparently not large enough to be attractive for setting up a business.

Dak, dak, dak, how do you know that? Please share with us the
methodology of your study regarding "not large enough to be attractive
for setting up a business", stupid dak.

regards, 
alexander.

--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm 
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can 
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards 
too, whereas GNU cannot.)