[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed |
Date: |
Tue, 13 Oct 2009 20:12:24 +0200 |
Alexander Terekhov wrote:
[... http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20091010152322226 ...]
> Well, at least her own pseudo-paralegal conclusions are quite a
> contribution on the recreational front! ;-)
The latest ones... priceless!
"Authored by: PJ on Tuesday, October 13 2009 @ 01:35 PM EDT
Not so. Think it through again. "
"Authored by: PJ on Tuesday, October 13 2009 @ 01:44 PM EDT
GPL is about freedom, son.
First sale is about being able to sell old stuff.
Puh lease. "
LMAO!
regards,
alexander.
--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards
too, whereas GNU cannot.)
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, (continued)
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, Rjack, 2009/10/14
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, Hyman Rosen, 2009/10/14
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/10/14
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, Hyman Rosen, 2009/10/14
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/10/14
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, Hyman Rosen, 2009/10/14
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, Rjack, 2009/10/14
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, Hyman Rosen, 2009/10/14
Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed,
Alexander Terekhov <=