[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Psystar/Apple/First sale on Groklaw

From: Alexander Terekhov
Subject: Re: Psystar/Apple/First sale on Groklaw
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 13:26:55 +0200

Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> Rjack <> wrote:
> > Here's the point. If you are an owner of a computer program copyright,
> > and license someone else to make a copy of your work on a physical
> > medium that is owned by the licensee then "Notwithstanding the
> > provisions of section 106(3)" gives the licensee (the lawful owner) of
> > that copy of a computer program the right to dispose of that copy as
> > long is it a transfer of ownership but not by rental, lease, or lending.
> > It's the PHYSICAL MEDIUM and not the MESSENGER that counts!
> Yes.  But is that transfer of ownership not still subject to the license
> conditions?  


Read 17 USC 109, silly.

See the words 

"is entitled, without the authority of the copyright owner"

do you?

What does it mean to a brainwashed GNUtian like you, Alan?


(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can 
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards 
too, whereas GNU cannot.)

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]