Re: [LMAO] El Reg: "GPLv2 - copyright code or contract?"

[David Kastrup]

Hadron <hadronquark@gmail.com> writes:

> David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> writes:
>
>> That has nothing whatsoever to do with "loopholes" or "complexity" in
>> the GPL.  It has to do with non-free software.
>>
>> The FSF stuck to its principles, and the makers of Qt decided to release
>> it under a free license after all.
>>
>> Where is your problem with that?
>
> he didn't say he had a problem. He said its not as clear cut as you
> make it out.

He only says that to annoy, because he knows it teases.

> As even you must realise by now because of the size of the threads and
> the fact you need to keep explaining things.

Where is the point in letting the deliberate liars run the show?

-- 
David Kastrup