[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [LMAO] El Reg: "GPLv2 - copyright code or contract?"

From: Chris Ahlstrom
Subject: Re: [LMAO] El Reg: "GPLv2 - copyright code or contract?"
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 15:03:31 -0400
User-agent: slrn/pre1.0.0-11 (Linux)

David Kastrup pulled this Usenet boner:

> Hadron <> writes:
>> David Kastrup <> writes:
>>> That has nothing whatsoever to do with "loopholes" or "complexity" in
>>> the GPL.  It has to do with non-free software.
>>> The FSF stuck to its principles, and the makers of Qt decided to release
>>> it under a free license after all.
>>> Where is your problem with that?
>> he didn't say he had a problem. He said its not as clear cut as you
>> make it out.
> He only says that to annoy, because he knows it teases.
>> As even you must realise by now because of the size of the threads and
>> the fact you need to keep explaining things.
> Where is the point in letting the deliberate liars run the show?

That would work for "Hadron".  The bastard won't even use his real name.

One problem with the deliberate liars, though.  No amount of explaining will
make them change their lies.

You will lose your present job and have to become a door to door mayonnaise

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]