[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Actual Damages in JMRI Case
From: |
Hyman Rosen |
Subject: |
Re: Actual Damages in JMRI Case |
Date: |
Wed, 04 Nov 2009 09:57:04 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) |
Alexander Terekhov wrote:
presumably because Plaintiff agrees with Defendants that
> his Actual Damages ARE NON-EXISTENT... no, Hyman?
<http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/opinions/08-1001.pdf>
Copyright licenses are designed to support the right to
exclude; money damages alone do not support or enforce that
right. The choice to exact consideration in the form of
compliance with the open source requirements of disclosure
and explanation of changes, rather than as a dollar-
denominated fee, is entitled to no less legal recognition.
Indeed, because a calculation of damages is inherently
speculative, these types of license restrictions might well
be rendered meaningless absent the ability to enforce through
injunctive relief.
- Actual Damages in JMRI Case, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/11/04
- Re: Actual Damages in JMRI Case, Hyman Rosen, 2009/11/04
- Re: Actual Damages in JMRI Case, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/11/04
- Re: Actual Damages in JMRI Case,
Hyman Rosen <=
- Re: Actual Damages in JMRI Case, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/11/04
- Re: Actual Damages in JMRI Case, Hyman Rosen, 2009/11/04
- Re: Actual Damages in JMRI Case, Rjack, 2009/11/04
- Re: Actual Damages in JMRI Case, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/11/06
- Re: Actual Damages in JMRI Case, Alan Mackenzie, 2009/11/06
- Re: Actual Damages in JMRI Case, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/11/07
- Re: Actual Damages in JMRI Case, Alan Mackenzie, 2009/11/07
- Re: Actual Damages in JMRI Case, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/11/09
- Re: Actual Damages in JMRI Case, David Kastrup, 2009/11/04
Re: Actual Damages in JMRI Case, Tim Smith, 2009/11/06