[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PJ lies about Terekhov--again
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: PJ lies about Terekhov--again |
Date: |
Mon, 16 Nov 2009 19:56:30 +0100 |
Hyman Rosen wrote:
>
> Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> > I think that Judge Alsup drunktardly erred
>
> Stay tuned for another exciting episode of Crank Vs. Court!
Well, the High-on-Crack Court is of opinion that replacing OS bootloader
constitutes creation of a derivative work that needs permission from OS'
copyright owner because "[w]ithout a bootloader, Mac OS X would not
operate." Do you share that absurd 'legal' reasoning, dear Hyman?
regards,
alexander.
--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards
too, whereas GNU cannot.)
Re: PJ lies about Terekhov--again, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/11/16
- Re: PJ lies about Terekhov--again, Hyman Rosen, 2009/11/16
- Re: PJ lies about Terekhov--again,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: PJ lies about Terekhov--again, Hyman Rosen, 2009/11/16
- Re: PJ lies about Terekhov--again, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/11/16
- Re: PJ lies about Terekhov--again, Hyman Rosen, 2009/11/16
- Re: PJ lies about Terekhov--again, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/11/16
- Re: PJ lies about Terekhov--again, Hyman Rosen, 2009/11/16
- Re: PJ lies about Terekhov--again, David Kastrup, 2009/11/16
- Re: PJ lies about Terekhov--again, Hyman Rosen, 2009/11/16
Re: PJ lies about Terekhov--again, Alan Mackenzie, 2009/11/16