[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: PJ lies about Terekhov--again

From: Hyman Rosen
Subject: Re: PJ lies about Terekhov--again
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:55:07 -0500
User-agent: Thunderbird (Windows/20090812)

David Kastrup wrote:
Uh no.  What you have done is what you have physically done.

This is just sophistry. The question before the court is,
through my actions, have I illegally prepared a derivative
work? The court says, yes you have, or no you have not, and
barring appeal, that is that.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]