Re: SFLC in frivolous mode again

[Alexander Terekhov]

David Kastrup wrote:
> 
> RJack <user@example.net> writes:
> 
> > David Kastrup wrote:
> >
> >> Most certainly the SFLC does not need to read the outpour of
> >> self-proclaimed legal amateurs in this newsgroup in order to plan their
> >> course of action.
> >>
> >> They have a quite better track record at predicting legal cases than the
> >> most vociferous know-alls here.
> >>
> >
> > Do you mean the eight frivolous suits the SFLC filed concerning BusyBox
> > prior to Erik Andersen attempting to steal the other contributing
> > developers' code contributions by fraudulently registering the BusyBox
> > program ?
> >
> > The SFLC has a perfect track record. Every case they filed concerning
> > Monsoon and BusyBox they dismissed before a judge could ever read one
> > of their idiotic complaints.
> 
> With the defendant coming into compliance and the source code being made
> available.  Since the defendants have been big corporations with big

Where is the "complete" source code (not to mention the GPL notice)
corresponding to http://www2.verizon.net/micro/actiontec/actiontec.asp
binary you idiot?

regards,
alexander.

--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm 
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can 
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards 
too, whereas GNU cannot.)