Re: SFLC in frivolous mode again

[RJack]

David Kastrup wrote:
> Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> writes:
>
> > In gnu.misc.discuss David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Most certainly the SFLC does not need to read the outpour of 
> > > self-proclaimed legal amateurs in this newsgroup in order to plan
> > > their course of action.
> > What makes you think Rjack is a legal amateur?
>
> Wishful thinking.  I'd not wish anybody to suck as badly in the area
> of his profession.
>
> > I don't think he's ever made the matter of his profession clear in 
> > this mailing list.

> So he is speaking and acting as an amateur here.  Whether or not he
> has a second life does not really play into this.

As fucking old as I am, I'm soon gonna' need a second life!

Sincerely,
RJack