[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SFLC in frivolous mode again
|
From: |
David Kastrup |
|
Subject: |
Re: SFLC in frivolous mode again |
|
Date: |
Fri, 08 Jan 2010 17:15:58 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.90 (gnu/linux) |
Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> writes:
> The NYSD court seems to get fed up with SFLC practice of filing delay
> stipulations.
>
> "No further extensions for this, or any defendant in this action, will
> be granted. (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 1/6/10) (cd)
> (Entered: 01/07/2010)"
Uh, "this, or any [other] defendant". The SFLC is the plaintiff. The
SFLC may have _agreed_ to the delay stipulation, but it certainly was
not the one to _file_ it.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: SFLC in frivolous mode again, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/01/08
- Re: SFLC in frivolous mode again, Hyman Rosen, 2010/01/08
- Re: SFLC in frivolous mode again,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: SFLC in frivolous mode again, RJack, 2010/01/09
- SFLC is succeeding., RJack, 2010/01/09
- Re: SFLC is succeeding., Alan Mackenzie, 2010/01/10
- Re: SFLC is succeeding., RJack, 2010/01/10
- Re: SFLC is succeeding., David Kastrup, 2010/01/10
- Re: SFLC is succeeding., chrisv, 2010/01/11
- Re: SFLC is succeeding., David Kastrup, 2010/01/11
- Re: SFLC is succeeding., Alan Mackenzie, 2010/01/11
- Re: SFLC is succeeding., RJack, 2010/01/11
- Re: SFLC is succeeding., Hyman Rosen, 2010/01/11