Re: Problem with GPLv3 FAQ about linking with Visual C++

[Alexander Terekhov]

Hyman Rosen wrote:
> 
> On 2/1/2010 2:00 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> > You can't have it both ways.
> 
> A combined work may be created only by license from the rights
> holders of the components. That's how GPL "contagion" works,

LOL! "contagion"... take your meds Hyman.

And try to explain to your doctor how "mere aggregation" using dynamic
linking with a "library" put in the same container (like
ZIP/JAR/ISO/whatnot)/same media together with a "program" is somehow
different than "mere aggregation" using static liking with a "library"
put in same container (like .EXE container)/same media together with a
"program" from the copyright view point.

There's no difference between static and dynamic linking in regards to
"mere aggregation" and copyright silly.

regards.
alexander.

--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm 
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can 
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards 
too, whereas GNU cannot.)