|
From: | Hyman Rosen |
Subject: | Re: Problem with GPLv3 FAQ about linking with Visual C++ |
Date: | Tue, 02 Feb 2010 10:38:46 -0500 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0 |
On 2/2/2010 10:32 AM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
Imagine that dynamically linked "library" is shipped along with the "program" (same ship/cargo truck/box/cd/whatnot) it's linked with just like in the case of statically linked aggregation.
Why would I imagine that? The point of having dynamically linked libraries is that the program generally accesses already installed versions. Shipping a program and its dynamically linked libraries together as one package would very likely be regarded the same as static linking.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |