[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Problem with GPLv3 FAQ about linking with Visual C++

From: Alexander Terekhov
Subject: Re: Problem with GPLv3 FAQ about linking with Visual C++
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2010 17:32:05 +0100

Hyman Rosen wrote:
> On 2/4/2010 5:44 AM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> > How come that SFLC moved the court to dismiss the case almost
> > immediately after the answer to the complaint was filed?
> Because, as always, the defendants complied with the GPL:
> <>

Not going into details regarding completeness of "complete corresponding
source code" just witness the difference of the asp pages above and

Verizon's actiontec.asp page is in clear violation of the GPL regarding
distribution of the GPL'd binary stuff inside

Recall that SFLC has lost the case miserably. The case was dismissed
with prejudice against plaintiff and absolutely no settlement with

"11. Upon information and belief, Verizon distributes to its 
customers the Actiontec MI424WR wireless router (“Infringing Product”), 
which contains embedded executable software (“Firmware”). Defendant 
also provides the Firmware corresponding to the Infringing Product for 
download via its website, at";


(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can 
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards 
too, whereas GNU cannot.)

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]