[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Problem with GPLv3 FAQ about linking with Visual C++

From: Alexander Terekhov
Subject: Re: Problem with GPLv3 FAQ about linking with Visual C++
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2010 20:37:30 +0100

Hyman Rosen wrote:
> On 2/4/2010 2:09 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> > Hyman Rosen wrote:
> > [...]
> >> If you are choosing to copy and distribute GPLed
> >> work unmodified, other sections of the various versions of
> >> the GPL tell you what to do.
> >
> > Yes Hyman, copying unmodified such as copying for compilations
> > (collective works) have nothing to do with
> >
> > "These requirements apply to the modified work"
> >
> > part of the GPL. So why did you quote the passage above you idiot?
> Aren't you talking about statically linked programs?

I'm talking about "copy and distribute" of compilations (collective
works) as a whole, including components, which means unmodified copying
of the components you retard. A "statically linked" aggregate is a
compilation (collective work) or uncopyrightable aggregation, depending
on the level of creativity involved in selection of components. Got it
now Hyman?


(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can 
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards 
too, whereas GNU cannot.)

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]