Re: The GFDL is _not_ a public license, says dak

[Hyman Rosen]

On 2/8/2010 10:55 AM, RJack wrote:
> "authorizing others to authorize" simply doesn't appear in
> 17 USC sec. 106 delineating the rights of owners of copyrights. Only
> in your Marxist land of GNU are copyright laws written that way.

It's amazing that you GPL skeptics don't realize how absurd
your arguments are. Were you correct, which you are not, any
printing house working for a publisher would be violating the
copyright of an author who had contracted with the publisher
to publish his book.