[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: The GFDL is _not_ a public license, says dak

From: Hyman Rosen
Subject: Re: The GFDL is _not_ a public license, says dak
Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2010 11:01:23 -0500
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv: Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0

On 2/8/2010 10:55 AM, RJack wrote:
"authorizing others to authorize" simply doesn't appear in
17 USC sec. 106 delineating the rights of owners of copyrights. Only
in your Marxist land of GNU are copyright laws written that way.

It's amazing that you GPL skeptics don't realize how absurd
your arguments are. Were you correct, which you are not, any
printing house working for a publisher would be violating the
copyright of an author who had contracted with the publisher
to publish his book.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]