[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [News] SFLC Responds to Copyright Misconceptions, Presents MoglenTa

From: Alexander Terekhov
Subject: Re: [News] SFLC Responds to Copyright Misconceptions, Presents MoglenTalk
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 17:02:11 +0100

Hyman Rosen wrote:
> On 2/10/2010 10:39 AM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> > Erik Andersen's alleged (and fraudulent in fact) claim of ownership
> <>
>      In addition to the copyright notices, McFarlane registered
>      copyright on the issues and the books.
>      ... McFarlane’s registrations no more revealed an intent to claim
>      copyright in Gaiman’s contributions, as distinct from McFarlane’s
>      own contributions as compiler and illustrator, . . .

Uh retard Hyman.,2&Search%5FArg=busybox&Search%5FCode=TALL&CNT=25&PID=C56aDfGGYoWR1oMK5BIoLaV4QdHU7&SEQ=20100210103005&SID=1

"Basis of Claim: New and revised computer source code by Erik Andersen.

Take the meds and call your doctor to explain to you that ownership of
"computer source code" (aka a "computer program" work under 17 USC 101)
has nothing to do with ownership "as compiler" as in 17 USC 101
'compilation'. Nor has it anything to do with ownership of separate and
independant works such "Pictorial, graphic, and sculptural works" under
17 USC 101, silly.


(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can 
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards 
too, whereas GNU cannot.)

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]