[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [News] SFLC Responds to Copyright Misconceptions, Presents MoglenT

From: Alexander Terekhov
Subject: Re: [News] SFLC Responds to Copyright Misconceptions, Presents MoglenTalk
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 17:18:33 +0100

Take your meds, Hyman.

Hyman Rosen wrote:
> On 2/10/2010 11:02 AM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> >  ownership of
> > "computer source code" (aka a "computer program" work under 17 USC 101)
> > has nothing to do with ownership "as compiler" as in 17 USC 101
> > 'compilation'. Nor has it anything to do with ownership of separate and
> > independant works such "Pictorial, graphic, and sculptural works" under
> > 17 USC 101
> <>
>      In addition to the copyright notices, McFarlane registered
>      copyright on the issues and the books.
>      ... McFarlane’s registrations no more revealed an intent to claim
>      copyright in Gaiman’s contributions, as distinct from McFarlane’s
>      own contributions as compiler and illustrator, . . .
> Your reading comprehension is as lacking as always.
> Registration of copyright in a work is not a claim
> against any co-authors who may exist. It is a formal
> notice by an author that he has copyright in the work.


(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can 
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards 
too, whereas GNU cannot.)

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]