[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [News] SFLC Responds to Copyright Misconceptions, Presents Moglen
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: [News] SFLC Responds to Copyright Misconceptions, Presents Moglen Talk |
Date: |
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 17:26:02 +0100 |
David Kastrup wrote:
>
> Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> writes:
>
> > David Kastrup wrote:
> > [...]
> >> > A compilation work which you call 'MacOSX' is a collective work (see
> >> > 17 USC 101 for both 'compilation' and 'collective work') of Apple and
> >> > only Apple, silly.
> >>
> >> Without any components with copyright by other parties?
> >
> > The copyright on components (distinct from the compilation work) is
> > totally separate/independent copyright (distinct from the copyright on
> > compilation) you retard dak.
>
> So for any component with copyrighted parts from other parties (like
> BSD), Apple could not sue for breach of copyright without having the
> other parties joining the suit?
>
> Reality check...
Apple's COMPILATION WORK is NOT A JOINT WORK you retard.
Apple took some BSD'd works and included that stuff in a compilation
work exclusively (C) by Apple and only Apple.
It's not a joint work under 17 USC 101.
regards,
alexander.
--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards
too, whereas GNU cannot.)
- Re: [News] SFLC Responds to Copyright Misconceptions, Presents MoglenTalk, (continued)
- Re: [News] SFLC Responds to Copyright Misconceptions, Presents MoglenTalk, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/10
- Re: [News] SFLC Responds to Copyright Misconceptions, Presents MoglenTalk, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/10
- Re: [News] SFLC Responds to Copyright Misconceptions, Presents MoglenTalk, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/11
- Re: [News] SFLC Responds to Copyright Misconceptions, Presents MoglenTalk, RJack, 2010/02/11
- Re: [News] SFLC Responds to Copyright Misconceptions, Presents MoglenTalk, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/11
- Re: [News] SFLC Responds to Copyright Misconceptions, Presents Moglen Talk, RJack, 2010/02/10
- Re: [News] SFLC Responds to Copyright Misconceptions, Presents Moglen Talk, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/10
- Re: [News] SFLC Responds to Copyright Misconceptions, Presents Moglen Talk, David Kastrup, 2010/02/10
- Re: [News] SFLC Responds to Copyright Misconceptions, Presents Moglen Talk, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/10
- Re: [News] SFLC Responds to Copyright Misconceptions, Presents Moglen Talk, David Kastrup, 2010/02/10
- Re: [News] SFLC Responds to Copyright Misconceptions, Presents Moglen Talk,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: [News] SFLC Responds to Copyright Misconceptions, Presents Moglen Talk, David Kastrup, 2010/02/10
- Re: [News] SFLC Responds to Copyright Misconceptions, Presents Moglen Talk, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/10
- Re: [News] SFLC Responds to Copyright Misconceptions, Presents Moglen Talk, David Kastrup, 2010/02/10
- Re: [News] SFLC Responds to Copyright Misconceptions, Presents Moglen Talk, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/10
Re: [News] SFLC Responds to Copyright Misconceptions, Presents Moglen Talk, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/10