[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [News] SFLC Responds to Copyright Misconceptions, Presents Moglen

From: Alexander Terekhov
Subject: Re: [News] SFLC Responds to Copyright Misconceptions, Presents Moglen Talk
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 18:33:01 +0100

David Kastrup wrote:
> > Apple took some BSD'd works and included that stuff in a compilation
> > work exclusively (C) by Apple and only Apple.
> How did the copyright of BSD come to cease on the portions that Apple
> changed?

BSD "copyright" didn't "come to cease" (it's too early for expiration
and I'm unaware of any abandonment/dedications to the public domain of
the BSD'd works) on the BSD'd portions that Apple changed unless Apple's
changes resulted in a complete removal of BSD'd protected expression.

At this point, why don't you just piss off and call

you retard dak?


P.S. "It is just like a suit to enforce a copyright license, which
arises under state law rather than under the Copyright Act. "

Hyman's lovin'

P.P.S. "the registered work is a compilation"

Hyman's lovin'

(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can 
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards 
too, whereas GNU cannot.)

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]