Re: [News] SFLC Responds to Copyright Misconceptions, Presents Moglen Talk

[Alexander Terekhov]

David Kastrup wrote:
[...]
> Why would a defendant make the GPLed sources available

There's no reason to do it -- to wit:

http://www2.verizon.net/micro/actiontec/actiontec.asp

To Hyman: take your meds first!

regards,
alexander.

P.S. "It is just like a suit to enforce a copyright license, which
arises under state law rather than under the Copyright Act. "

Hyman's lovin' http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Gaiman_v._McFarlane

P.P.S. "the registered work is a compilation"

Hyman's lovin' http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Gaiman_v._McFarlane

--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm 
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can 
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards 
too, whereas GNU cannot.)