Re: [News] SFLC Responds to Copyright Misconceptions, Presents Moglen Talk

[Alexander Terekhov]

David Kastrup wrote:
> 
> Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> writes:
> 
> > David Kastrup wrote:
> > [...]
> >> Why would a defendant make the GPLed sources available
> >
> > There's no reason to do it -- to wit:
> >
> > http://www2.verizon.net/micro/actiontec/actiontec.asp
> 
> That's a link to a firmware upgrade.  "This firmware update is
> applicable to both Actiontec and Verizon branded FiOS Routers."  As I
> hear, those routers come with a manual detailing where to get the source
> to the firmware.  The links have been pointed out to you as well.

That "where to get" is NOT Verizon's location and has nothing to do with
Verison's location above, silly dak.

regards,
alexander.

P.S. "It is just like a suit to enforce a copyright license, which
arises under state law rather than under the Copyright Act. "

Hyman's lovin' http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Gaiman_v._McFarlane

P.P.S. "the registered work is a compilation"

Hyman's lovin' http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Gaiman_v._McFarlane

--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm 
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can 
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards 
too, whereas GNU cannot.)