[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [News] SFLC Responds to Copyright Misconceptions, Presents Moglen Ta

From: RJack
Subject: Re: [News] SFLC Responds to Copyright Misconceptions, Presents Moglen Talk
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 13:40:40 -0500
User-agent: Thunderbird (Windows/20090812)

David Kastrup wrote:
RJack <> writes:

Hyman Rosen wrote:
On 2/10/2010 10:08 AM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
At some point, the New York bar will have no choice but to disbar the entire gang of utterly incompetent GNU arch legal beagles from SFLC for consistent filing of frivolous lawsuits such as in which (1) "the Software Freedom Conservancy" is utterly frivolous 'plaintiff' because it doesn't own ANY busybox copyrights and (2) Erik Andersen is also utterly frivolous 'plaintiff' because he was NOT joined by Bruce Perens and other contributors to the joint work known as busybox at
The SFLC has had successful outcomes in every single case that it
has filed - all defendants have come into compliance with the GPL. No defendant has chosen to fight the plaintiffs.
The plaintiffs chose to file automatic involuntary dismissals before

What's "automatic" and "involuntary" about dismissals that are filed
 after settling?

any judge could ever read their frivolous Complaints. Why why would
 a plaintiff answer a Complaint that has been dismissed?

Why would a defendant make the GPLed sources available in the course of a settlement?

If the full force and credibility of your arguments turn on others
hurried typographical errors, you've got even bigger problems than I
first imagined. Retreat to that tactic implies an utterly desperate lack
of serious intellect.

"The Captain's scared them out of the water!"


RJack :)

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]