Re: [News] SFLC Responds to Copyright Misconceptions, Presents MoglenTalk

[Alexander Terekhov]

Hyman Rosen wrote:
> 
> On 2/10/2010 2:24 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> > "GPL Code Requests
> > 4250 Buckingham Drive Suite #400
> > Colorado Springs, Co 80907 "
> >
> > Right?
> >
> > Now,
> >
> > http://www.manta.com/coms2/dnbcompany_6f3dp
> >
> > "Actiontec Electronics, Inc (Actiontec)
> > 4250 Buckingham Dr # 400
> > Colorado Springs, CO  80907 . . .
> > Phone: (719) 884-8306
> > Website: www.actiontec.com
> >
> > http://yellowpages.gazette.com/actiontec.9.52901761p.home.html
> >
> > "Actiontec
> > (719) 955-9001
> > 4250 Buckingham Dr
> > Colorado Springs, CO 80907
> > Map and Directions
> 
> Why is this surprising? Actiontec makes the routers and the
> firmware, so they are the natural parties to fulfill the

The SFLC has sued Verizon (the case was then quickly dismissed with
prejudice against plaintiffs and without any settlement filed to be
"rolled into a court order"
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Settlement_(litigation)>) and you've been
bragging about all plaintiffs being scared out of the water, Hyman.

But to wit:

http://www2.verizon.net/micro/actiontec/actiontec.asp

Where is the complete corresponding source code regarding the complete
binary code above YOU MORON HYMAN?

Please share with us the location of the complete corresponding source
code (re: complete binary code at
http://www2.verizon.net/micro/actiontec/actiontec.asp) YOU MORON HYMAN,
please.

regards,
alexander.

P.S. "It is just like a suit to enforce a copyright license, which
arises under state law rather than under the Copyright Act. "

Hyman's lovin' http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Gaiman_v._McFarlane

P.P.S. "the registered work is a compilation"

Hyman's lovin' http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Gaiman_v._McFarlane

--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm 
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can 
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards 
too, whereas GNU cannot.)