[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bye - Bye , open source derivative works litigation
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: Bye - Bye , open source derivative works litigation |
Date: |
Thu, 11 Feb 2010 00:17:04 +0100 |
Hyman Rosen wrote:
>
> On 2/10/2010 5:48 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> > LMAO! Don't you think that the GPL is not the state and as such it just
> > can't grant any copyright irrespective of jointness under 17 USC 101
>
> In the case of a GPLed work . . .
One *SINGLE* (consisting of a separate unique whole) project is not a
joint work although it produces a (single) (combined) "larger
program"???
"If the program dynamically links plug-ins, and they make function calls
to each other and share data structures, we believe they form a single
program, which must be treated as an extension of both the main program
and the plug-ins. "
"But if the semantics of the communication are intimate enough,
exchanging complex internal data structures, that too could be a basis
to consider the two parts as combined into a larger program. "
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html
(The static linking "whole" aside for a moment, that is.)
Please elaborate, Hyman.
TIA!!!
regards,
alexander.
P.S. "It is just like a suit to enforce a copyright license, which
arises under state law rather than under the Copyright Act. "
Hyman's lovin' http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Gaiman_v._McFarlane
P.P.S. "the registered work is a compilation"
Hyman's lovin' http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Gaiman_v._McFarlane
--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards
too, whereas GNU cannot.)
- Re: Bye - Bye , open source derivative works litigation, (continued)
- Re: Bye - Bye , open source derivative works litigation, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/10
- Re: Bye - Bye , open source derivative works litigation, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/10
- Re: Bye - Bye , open source derivative works litigation, RJack, 2010/02/10
- Re: Bye - Bye , open source derivative works litigation, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/10
- Re: Bye - Bye , open source derivative works litigation, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/10
- Re: Bye - Bye , open source derivative works litigation, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/10
- Re: Bye - Bye , open source derivative works litigation, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/10
- Re: Bye - Bye , open source derivative works litigation, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/10
- Re: Bye - Bye , open source derivative works litigation,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: Bye - Bye , open source derivative works litigation, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/11
- Re: Bye - Bye , open source derivative works litigation, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/11
- Re: Bye - Bye , open source derivative works litigation, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/11
- Re: Bye - Bye , open source derivative works litigation, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/11
- Re: Bye - Bye , open source derivative works litigation, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/11
- Re: Bye - Bye , open source derivative works litigation, Snit, 2010/02/11
- Re: Bye - Bye , open source derivative works litigation, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/11
- Re: Bye - Bye , open source derivative works litigation, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/11
- Re: Bye - Bye , open source derivative works litigation, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/11
- Re: Bye - Bye , open source derivative works litigation, chrisv, 2010/02/11